For Growth-Stage SaaS

You have 30 engineers, zero QA, and a Playwright folder collecting dust

Growth-stage teams know they need tests. They don't have 6 months to build Playwright infrastructure or $96K/year for QA Wolf. Protect the flows that drive activation, revenue, and retention before the next incident.

Who this is for

Role
CTO, founding engineer, or engineering lead
Company
Post-seed to Series B SaaS (20-100 engineers) shipping weekly with AI-generated code
Trigger
Production incident embarrasses the team. New engineering lead asks 'where are the tests?' Customer reports a bug a basic smoke test would catch.

This is for you if:

  • Ship 5+ PRs per day
  • Fewer than 2 dedicated QA engineers
  • Using Playwright, Cypress, or no E2E framework at all
  • Had a production bug in the last 30 days that existing tests missed
  • Test suite run time over 15 minutes per PR (or no test suite at all)

The pain is real

“I inherited 10,000 lines of code with zero tests. No documentation. No comments. Just spaghetti code from a developer who quit 3 years ago.”

Medium / Let's Code Futuresource

“In the rush to get stuff out, time-consuming things get skipped like user testing, automation, analytics, monitoring, and manual testing.”

The Pragmatic Engineersource

42% of developers aren't comfortable writing automation scripts

41% of committed code is now AI-generated, but test coverage is declining

QA Wolf charges ~$96K/year. One buyer reported an 800% pricing increase at renewal.

Why nobody else solves this

Playwright is free but takes 2-6 months of infrastructure work before you get meaningful coverage. 55% of teams spend 20+ hours/week on maintenance once they do.

QA Wolf solves the problem but costs $96K/year and their team owns your tests. One buyer reported an 800% pricing increase at renewal. Growth-stage companies cannot afford this.

AI code generation means teams write 3x more code with less test coverage. 41% of committed code is AI-generated, and teams need test coverage that keeps up without adding another maintenance backlog.

The workflow today vs. with Zerocheck

Without Zerocheck

New engineering lead joins a 25-person startup. 40K lines of code, zero E2E tests. Evaluates Playwright: Day 1 is npm install + config. Day 2 is a login test that breaks on OAuth. Week 2: selectors break on a CSS refactor. Week 4: 5 tests exist, 3 engineers are frustrated. The initiative dies.

With Zerocheck

Connect repo + staging URL. Zerocheck discovers critical flows and saves suggested tests in plain English. Engineer reviews and approves the tests that should run. The approved suite runs on future GitHub PRs, and PR diffs can suggest more tests for review.

How it works

1

Start from the staging app and GitHub repo you already have

2

Find the high-risk paths your team cannot afford to break

3

Review generated coverage before it joins the PR gate

4

Give engineers PR comments with the evidence needed to fix failures

FAQ

We have zero tests. Is that a problem?

It is the ideal starting point. Zerocheck interacts with your app, discovers critical flows, and generates tests for review. Approved generated tests then run on GitHub PRs alongside human-authored tests.

How is this different from QA Wolf?

QA Wolf deploys a managed team to write and maintain your tests at roughly $96K per year. One buyer reported an 800% pricing increase at renewal. Zerocheck is self-serve: your team stays in control, Zerocheck suggests tests from PR diffs for review, at a fraction of the cost.

We use Cursor/Copilot for code. Does Zerocheck work with AI-generated code?

Yes. 41% of committed code is now AI-generated, but test coverage is declining. Your coding agent writes features; Zerocheck interacts with the app, generates test suggestions for review, and runs approved tests on PRs and monitors.

What if we already have some Playwright or Cypress tests?

Keep them. Zerocheck adds change-aware test generation and visual interaction on top. Your existing tests still run. Zerocheck fills coverage gaps and eliminates the maintenance burden.

You have 30 engineers, zero QA, and a Playwright folder collecting dust

E2E testing for teams that ship fast without a QA department.

Get a demo